1998 Citroen Xsara vs. 1952 Maserati A6G
To start off, 1998 Citroen Xsara is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Citroen Xsara (165 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1952 Maserati A6G. (158 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1952 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 650 kg more than 1952 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Citroen Xsara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Citroen Xsara | 1952 Maserati A6G | |
Make | Citroen | Maserati |
Model | Xsara | A6G |
Year Released | 1998 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 550 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2290 mm |