1998 Citroen Xsara vs. 1983 Jeep CJ
To start off, 1998 Citroen Xsara is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Citroen Xsara (165 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1983 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1983 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Jeep CJ weights approximately 90 kg more than 1998 Citroen Xsara.
Because 1983 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Citroen Xsara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Citroen Xsara (193 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1998 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Citroen Xsara | 1983 Jeep CJ | |
Make | Citroen | Jeep |
Model | Xsara | CJ |
Year Released | 1998 | 1983 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 193 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2380 mm |