1998 Citroen Xsara vs. 1986 Mazda 929
To start off, 1998 Citroen Xsara is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Citroen Xsara (165 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1986 Mazda 929. (145 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1986 Mazda 929.
Because 1986 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Citroen Xsara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Mazda 929 (230 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Citroen Xsara. (193 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1986 Mazda 929 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Citroen Xsara.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Citroen Xsara | 1986 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | Xsara | 929 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 193 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2720 mm |