1998 Citroen Xsara vs. 1986 Volvo 245
To start off, 1998 Citroen Xsara is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Volvo 245. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Volvo 245 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Citroen Xsara (165 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1986 Volvo 245. (96 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1986 Volvo 245.
Because 1986 Volvo 245 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Volvo 245. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Citroen Xsara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Citroen Xsara (193 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Volvo 245. (157 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1998 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Volvo 245.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Citroen Xsara | 1986 Volvo 245 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | Xsara | 245 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 193 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2660 mm |