1998 Citroen Xsara vs. 1989 Acura Integra
To start off, 1998 Citroen Xsara is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Acura Integra would be higher. At 1,909 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Acura Integra (125 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1998 Citroen Xsara. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Acura Integra should accelerate faster than 1998 Citroen Xsara.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Citroen Xsara (210 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Acura Integra. (139 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1998 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Acura Integra.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Citroen Xsara | 1989 Acura Integra | |
Make | Citroen | Acura |
Model | Xsara | Integra |
Year Released | 1998 | 1989 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1909 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 125 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 139 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.7:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4355 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1665 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2520 mm |