1998 Citroen Xsara vs. 1990 Rover Metro
To start off, 1998 Citroen Xsara is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Rover Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Rover Metro would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Citroen Xsara (165 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1990 Rover Metro. (75 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1990 Rover Metro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 350 kg more than 1990 Rover Metro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Citroen Xsara (193 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Rover Metro. (117 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1998 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Rover Metro.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Citroen Xsara | 1990 Rover Metro | |
Make | Citroen | Rover |
Model | Xsara | Metro |
Year Released | 1998 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1395 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 193 Nm | 117 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 3530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2270 mm |