1998 Citroen Xsara vs. 2000 Volvo S60

To start off, 2000 Volvo S60 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Citroen Xsara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Citroen Xsara would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2000 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Volvo S60 (160 HP) has 86 more horse power than 1998 Citroen Xsara. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1998 Citroen Xsara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Volvo S60 weights approximately 445 kg more than 1998 Citroen Xsara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Volvo S60 (340 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Citroen Xsara. (113 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2000 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Citroen Xsara.

Compare all specifications:

1998 Citroen Xsara 2000 Volvo S60
Make Citroen Volvo
Model Xsara S60
Year Released 1998 2000
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1399 cc 2435 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 74 HP 160 HP
Torque 113 Nm 340 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 1750 RPM
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1020 kg 1465 kg
Vehicle Length 4180 mm 4580 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 2650 mm