1998 Citroen Xsara vs. 2003 Mazda 3

To start off, 2003 Mazda 3 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Citroen Xsara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Citroen Xsara would be higher. At 1,761 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 3 (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1998 Citroen Xsara. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1998 Citroen Xsara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 3 weights approximately 340 kg more than 1998 Citroen Xsara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Citroen Xsara (153 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 3. (140 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1998 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 3.

Compare all specifications:

1998 Citroen Xsara 2003 Mazda 3
Make Citroen Mazda
Model Xsara 3
Year Released 1998 2003
Body Type Hatchback Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1761 cc 1498 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 89 HP 108 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 153 Nm 140 Nm
Torque RPM 2600 RPM 4500 RPM
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Doors 3 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1080 kg 1420 kg
Vehicle Length 4170 mm 4500 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 2650 mm