1998 Citroen Xsara vs. 2005 Kia K2700
To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Citroen Xsara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Citroen Xsara would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Citroen Xsara (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 430 kg more than 1998 Citroen Xsara.
Because 2005 Kia K2700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Kia K2700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Citroen Xsara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Citroen Xsara (210 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia K2700. (175 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1998 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia K2700.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Citroen Xsara | 2005 Kia K2700 | |
Make | Citroen | Kia |
Model | Xsara | K2700 |
Year Released | 1998 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 1909 cc | 2665 cc |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 94.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 95 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1530 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2390 mm |