1998 Citroen Xsara vs. 2012 Mazda BT-50

To start off, 2012 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Citroen Xsara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Citroen Xsara would be higher. At 2,606 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Citroen Xsara (165 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2012 Mazda BT-50. (123 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 2012 Mazda BT-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda BT-50 weights approximately 350 kg more than 1998 Citroen Xsara.

Because 2012 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Citroen Xsara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda BT-50 (206 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Citroen Xsara. (193 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Citroen Xsara.

Compare all specifications:

1998 Citroen Xsara 2012 Mazda BT-50
Make Citroen Mazda
Model Xsara BT-50
Year Released 1998 2012
Body Type Hatchback Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1998 cc 2606 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 165 HP 123 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 4600 RPM
Torque 193 Nm 206 Nm
Torque RPM 5500 RPM 3500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Doors 3 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1200 kg 1550 kg
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1810 mm
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 3010 mm