1998 Citroen ZX vs. 1963 Rover 2000
To start off, 1998 Citroen ZX is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 1,978 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Rover 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Rover 2000 (91 HP) has 17 more horse power than 1998 Citroen ZX. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Rover 2000 should accelerate faster than 1998 Citroen ZX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Rover 2000 weights approximately 192 kg more than 1998 Citroen ZX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Rover 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Rover 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Citroen ZX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Rover 2000 (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Citroen ZX. (110 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1963 Rover 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Citroen ZX.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Citroen ZX | 1963 Rover 2000 | |
Make | Citroen | Rover |
Model | ZX | 2000 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 1978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 91 HP |
Torque | 110 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 85.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 85.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1212 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1410 mm |