1998 Citroen ZX vs. 1975 Datsun 280Z
To start off, 1998 Citroen ZX is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Datsun 280Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Datsun 280Z would be higher. At 2,753 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Datsun 280Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Datsun 280Z (150 HP) has 76 more horse power than 1998 Citroen ZX. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1975 Datsun 280Z should accelerate faster than 1998 Citroen ZX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Datsun 280Z weights approximately 180 kg more than 1998 Citroen ZX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1975 Datsun 280Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Datsun 280Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Citroen ZX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Datsun 280Z (221 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Citroen ZX. (110 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1975 Datsun 280Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Citroen ZX.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Citroen ZX | 1975 Datsun 280Z | |
Make | Citroen | Datsun |
Model | ZX | 280Z |
Year Released | 1998 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 2753 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 150 HP |
Torque | 110 Nm | 221 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 8.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4399 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1631 mm |