1998 Citroen ZX vs. 1992 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1998 Citroen ZX is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,302 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Mustang (106 HP) has 32 more horse power than 1998 Citroen ZX. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1998 Citroen ZX.
Because 1992 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Citroen ZX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Mustang (183 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Citroen ZX. (110 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1992 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Citroen ZX.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Citroen ZX | 1992 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | ZX | Mustang |
Year Released | 1998 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 2302 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 106 HP |
Torque | 110 Nm | 183 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1330 mm |