1998 Daewoo Arcadia vs. 2002 Renault Clio
To start off, 2002 Renault Clio is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Daewoo Arcadia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Daewoo Arcadia would be higher. At 3,206 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Daewoo Arcadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Renault Clio (252 HP @ 7150 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1998 Daewoo Arcadia. (202 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1998 Daewoo Arcadia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Daewoo Arcadia weights approximately 180 kg more than 2002 Renault Clio.
Because 2002 Renault Clio is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Renault Clio. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Daewoo Arcadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Daewoo Arcadia | 2002 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Daewoo | Renault |
| Model | Arcadia | Clio |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3206 cc | 2946 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 202 HP | 252 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 7150 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1410 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 3850 mm |
