1998 Daewoo Matiz vs. 1950 Riley RM A
To start off, 1998 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,496 cc (4 cylinders), 1950 Riley RM A is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Riley RM A weights approximately 382 kg more than 1998 Daewoo Matiz.
Because 1950 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Daewoo Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Daewoo Matiz | 1950 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Daewoo | Riley |
| Model | Matiz | RM A |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1950 |
| Engine Size | 796 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 853 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2870 mm |
