1998 Daewoo Matiz vs. 1967 Jaguar MK II

To start off, 1998 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Jaguar MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Jaguar MK II would be higher. At 2,481 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Jaguar MK II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Jaguar MK II (120 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1998 Daewoo Matiz. (49 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Jaguar MK II should accelerate faster than 1998 Daewoo Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Jaguar MK II weights approximately 597 kg more than 1998 Daewoo Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1967 Jaguar MK II is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Jaguar MK II. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Daewoo Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Jaguar MK II (195 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Daewoo Matiz. (69 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 1967 Jaguar MK II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Daewoo Matiz.

Compare all specifications:

1998 Daewoo Matiz 1967 Jaguar MK II
Make Daewoo Jaguar
Model Matiz MK II
Year Released 1998 1967
Body Type Hatchback Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 796 cc 2481 cc
Engine Cylinders 3 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 49 HP 120 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5750 RPM
Torque 69 Nm 195 Nm
Torque RPM 4600 RPM 2000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 68.5 mm 83 mm
Engine Stroke Size 72 mm 76.5 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.3:1 8.0:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 853 kg 1450 kg
Vehicle Length 3500 mm 5000 mm
Vehicle Width 1500 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1490 mm 1600 mm
Wheelbase Size 2350 mm 2900 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 35 L 90 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]