1998 Daewoo Matiz vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 1998 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,287 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 66 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Volvo 66 (56 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1998 Daewoo Matiz. (49 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Volvo 66 should accelerate faster than 1998 Daewoo Matiz.
Because 1980 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Daewoo Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Volvo 66 (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Daewoo Matiz. (69 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 1980 Volvo 66 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Daewoo Matiz. 1980 Volvo 66 has automatic transmission and 1998 Daewoo Matiz has manual transmission. 1998 Daewoo Matiz will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Volvo 66 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Daewoo Matiz | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Daewoo | Volvo |
Model | Matiz | 66 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 796 cc | 1287 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 69 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68.5 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1550 mm |