1998 Daewoo Matiz vs. 1992 Holden Nova
To start off, 1998 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Nova would be higher. At 1,397 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Holden Nova is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Holden Nova (81 HP) has 32 more horse power than 1998 Daewoo Matiz. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Holden Nova should accelerate faster than 1998 Daewoo Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Holden Nova weights approximately 162 kg more than 1998 Daewoo Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Holden Nova (118 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Daewoo Matiz. (69 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 1992 Holden Nova will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Daewoo Matiz.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Daewoo Matiz | 1992 Holden Nova | |
| Make | Daewoo | Holden |
| Model | Matiz | Nova |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 796 cc | 1397 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 81 HP |
| Torque | 69 Nm | 118 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 853 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2440 mm |
