1998 Daewoo Matiz vs. 1992 Mercedes-Benz G
To start off, 1998 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mercedes-Benz G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mercedes-Benz G would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Mercedes-Benz G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mercedes-Benz G (125 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1998 Daewoo Matiz. (49 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mercedes-Benz G should accelerate faster than 1998 Daewoo Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mercedes-Benz G weights approximately 1027 kg more than 1998 Daewoo Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1992 Mercedes-Benz G is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Daewoo Matiz. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mercedes-Benz G will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mercedes-Benz G (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Daewoo Matiz. (69 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 1992 Mercedes-Benz G will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Daewoo Matiz.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Daewoo Matiz | 1992 Mercedes-Benz G | |
Make | Daewoo | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Matiz | G |
Year Released | 1998 | 1992 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 796 cc | 2299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 125 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 69 Nm | 192 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68.5 mm | 95.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 80.2 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 853 kg | 1880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2410 mm |