1998 Daewoo Matiz vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Daewoo Matiz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Daewoo Matiz would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V (548 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 499 more horse power than 1998 Daewoo Matiz. (49 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1998 Daewoo Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 1061 kg more than 1998 Daewoo Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Cadillac CTS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Daewoo Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V (747 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 678 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Daewoo Matiz. (69 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Daewoo Matiz.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Daewoo Matiz | 2013 Cadillac CTS-V | |
Make | Daewoo | Cadillac |
Model | Matiz | CTS-V |
Year Released | 1998 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 796 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 548 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 69 Nm | 747 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68.5 mm | 103 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 853 kg | 1914 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1884 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1422 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 68 L |