1998 Daihatsu Move vs. 1962 Fiat Grand Break
To start off, 1998 Daihatsu Move is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Fiat Grand Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Fiat Grand Break would be higher. At 1,795 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Fiat Grand Break is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Fiat Grand Break weights approximately 445 kg more than 1998 Daihatsu Move.
Because 1962 Fiat Grand Break is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Fiat Grand Break. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Daihatsu Move, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Daihatsu Move | 1962 Fiat Grand Break | |
| Make | Daihatsu | Fiat |
| Model | Move | Grand Break |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 989 cc | 1795 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1270 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3420 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 38 L |
