1998 Daihatsu Sirion vs. 1956 Riley RM A
To start off, 1998 Daihatsu Sirion is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,495 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Riley RM A is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Riley RM A weights approximately 420 kg more than 1998 Daihatsu Sirion.
Because 1956 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Daihatsu Sirion, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Daihatsu Sirion | 1956 Riley RM A | |
Make | Daihatsu | Riley |
Model | Sirion | RM A |
Year Released | 1998 | 1956 |
Engine Size | 987 cc | 1495 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 815 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3680 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2870 mm |