1998 Daihatsu Sirion vs. 1969 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 1998 Daihatsu Sirion is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1998 Daihatsu Sirion. (100 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1998 Daihatsu Sirion. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 515 kg more than 1998 Daihatsu Sirion. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1998 Daihatsu Sirion is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Dodge Challenger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Daihatsu Sirion will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (233 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Daihatsu Sirion. (120 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Daihatsu Sirion.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Daihatsu Sirion | 1969 Dodge Challenger | |
Make | Daihatsu | Dodge |
Model | Sirion | Challenger |
Year Released | 1998 | 1969 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1298 cc | 3687 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 120 Nm | 233 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 8.6:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1415 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3680 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 72 L |