1998 Daihatsu Sirion vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Daihatsu Sirion. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Daihatsu Sirion would be higher.
Because 1998 Daihatsu Sirion is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Smart Fortwo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Daihatsu Sirion will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Smart Fortwo (130 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Daihatsu Sirion. (120 Nm). This means 2013 Smart Fortwo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Daihatsu Sirion. 2013 Smart Fortwo has automatic transmission and 1998 Daihatsu Sirion has manual transmission. 1998 Daihatsu Sirion will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Smart Fortwo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Daihatsu Sirion | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Daihatsu | Smart |
Model | Sirion | Fortwo |
Year Released | 1998 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 120 Nm | 130 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1559 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 1867 mm |