1998 Dodge Copperhead vs. 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300
To start off, 1998 Dodge Copperhead is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Dodge Copperhead (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. (158 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Dodge Copperhead should accelerate faster than 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 weights approximately 873 kg more than 1998 Dodge Copperhead.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Dodge Copperhead | 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 | |
Make | Dodge | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Copperhead | 300 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2699 cc | 2996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1057 kg | 1930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 5200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 3160 mm |