1998 Dodge Copperhead vs. 1982 Mazda 929
To start off, 1998 Dodge Copperhead is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 2,699 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Dodge Copperhead is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Dodge Copperhead (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1982 Mazda 929. (100 HP @ 5900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Dodge Copperhead should accelerate faster than 1982 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Mazda 929 weights approximately 103 kg more than 1998 Dodge Copperhead.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Dodge Copperhead | 1982 Mazda 929 | |
| Make | Dodge | Mazda |
| Model | Copperhead | 929 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2699 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1057 kg | 1160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2620 mm |
