1998 Dodge Dakota vs. 2009 Jeep Patriot

To start off, 2009 Jeep Patriot is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Dodge Dakota would be higher. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Patriot (148 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1998 Dodge Dakota. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Patriot should accelerate faster than 1998 Dodge Dakota.

Because 1998 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Jeep Patriot. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Jeep Patriot has automatic transmission and 1998 Dodge Dakota has manual transmission. 1998 Dodge Dakota will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Jeep Patriot will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1998 Dodge Dakota 2009 Jeep Patriot
Make Dodge Jeep
Model Dakota Patriot
Year Released 1998 2009
Body Type Pickup SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Type in-line electric
Horse Power 118 HP 148 HP
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 3 seats 5 seats


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]