1998 Dodge Neon vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1998 Dodge Neon is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Dodge Neon (150 HP) has 59 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 46 kg more than 1998 Dodge Neon.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Dodge Neon (175 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm). This means 1998 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Dodge Neon | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Dodge | Triumph |
| Model | Neon | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 91 HP |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1124 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2700 mm |
