1998 Dodge Neon vs. 1983 Matra-Simca Murena
To start off, 1998 Dodge Neon is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Matra-Simca Murena. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Matra-Simca Murena would be higher. At 2,156 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Matra-Simca Murena is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Dodge Neon (150 HP) has 34 more horse power than 1983 Matra-Simca Murena. (116 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1983 Matra-Simca Murena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Dodge Neon weights approximately 74 kg more than 1983 Matra-Simca Murena. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1983 Matra-Simca Murena is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Matra-Simca Murena. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Dodge Neon | 1983 Matra-Simca Murena | |
Make | Dodge | Matra-Simca |
Model | Neon | Murena |
Year Released | 1998 | 1983 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2156 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 116 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1124 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1230 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2440 mm |