1998 Dodge Neon vs. 2004 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Renault Clio is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Dodge Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Dodge Neon would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Dodge Neon (150 HP) has 52 more horse power than 2004 Renault Clio. (98 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Dodge Neon weights approximately 69 kg more than 2004 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Dodge Neon (175 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Renault Clio. (127 Nm). This means 1998 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Dodge Neon | 2004 Renault Clio | |
Make | Dodge | Renault |
Model | Neon | Clio |
Year Released | 1998 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 98 HP |
Torque | 175 Nm | 127 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1124 kg | 1055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2590 mm |