1998 Dodge Neon vs. 2012 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2012 Jeep Compass is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Dodge Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Dodge Neon would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jeep Compass (158 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1998 Dodge Neon. (150 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1998 Dodge Neon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Jeep Compass weights approximately 285 kg more than 1998 Dodge Neon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jeep Compass (191 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Dodge Neon. (175 Nm). This means 2012 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Dodge Neon.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Dodge Neon | 2012 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Dodge | Jeep |
Model | Neon | Compass |
Year Released | 1998 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 158 HP |
Torque | 175 Nm | 191 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1124 kg | 1409 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4448 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1814 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1651 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2634 mm |