1998 Dodge Ram vs. 1962 Dodge Polara
To start off, 1998 Dodge Ram is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,905 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Dodge Polara (301 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1998 Dodge Ram. (223 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Dodge Polara should accelerate faster than 1998 Dodge Ram. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Dodge Ram weights approximately 575 kg more than 1962 Dodge Polara.
Because 1998 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Dodge Polara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Dodge Ram | 1962 Dodge Polara | |
| Make | Dodge | Dodge |
| Model | Ram | Polara |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5208 cc | 5905 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 223 HP | 301 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1525 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 5140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2030 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2960 mm |
