1998 Dodge Ram vs. 1962 Holden EK
To start off, 1998 Dodge Ram is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 3,906 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Dodge Ram (173 HP) has 109 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Dodge Ram (305 Nm) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 1998 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Dodge Ram | 1962 Holden EK | |
| Make | Dodge | Holden |
| Model | Ram | EK |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3906 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 173 HP | 64 HP |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 164 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
