1998 Dodge Ram vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1998 Dodge Ram is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 5,208 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Dodge Ram (223 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Dodge Ram weights approximately 930 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Dodge Ram (399 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 241 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1998 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Dodge Ram | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Dodge | Triumph |
Model | Ram | 2000 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5208 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 399 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2030 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2700 mm |