1998 Dodge Ram vs. 1965 Maserati Mistral
To start off, 1998 Dodge Ram is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Maserati Mistral. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Maserati Mistral would be higher. At 3,905 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Maserati Mistral (232 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1998 Dodge Ram. (173 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Maserati Mistral should accelerate faster than 1998 Dodge Ram. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Dodge Ram weights approximately 830 kg more than 1965 Maserati Mistral.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Maserati Mistral (325 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Dodge Ram. (305 Nm). This means 1965 Maserati Mistral will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Dodge Ram.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Dodge Ram | 1965 Maserati Mistral | |
Make | Dodge | Maserati |
Model | Ram | Mistral |
Year Released | 1998 | 1965 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3905 cc | 3484 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 173 HP | 232 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 325 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2070 kg | 1240 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2030 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2410 mm |