1998 Dodge Ram vs. 1980 Lotus Eclat
To start off, 1998 Dodge Ram is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Lotus Eclat. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Lotus Eclat would be higher. At 3,905 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1020 kg more than 1980 Lotus Eclat.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Dodge Ram | 1980 Lotus Eclat | |
Make | Dodge | Lotus |
Model | Ram | Eclat |
Year Released | 1998 | 1980 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3905 cc | 1971 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 173 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2070 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2030 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2490 mm |