1998 Dodge Ram vs. 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 1998 Dodge Ram is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste would be higher. At 5,899 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1185 kg more than 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Because 1998 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Dodge Ram | 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
| Make | Dodge | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Ram | Celeste |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5899 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 242 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 2130 kg | 945 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2030 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2350 mm |
