1998 Dodge Ram vs. 1982 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1998 Dodge Ram is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Dodge Ram weights approximately 590 kg more than 1982 Mercury Cougar.
Because 1998 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Dodge Ram | 1982 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Dodge | Mercury |
Model | Ram | Cougar |
Year Released | 1998 | 1982 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3906 cc | 4942 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 173 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2070 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2650 mm |