1998 Dodge Ram vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 5,441 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK (362 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 189 more horse power than 1998 Dodge Ram. (173 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1998 Dodge Ram. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Dodge Ram weights approximately 258 kg more than 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Because 1998 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK (510 Nm) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Dodge Ram. (305 Nm). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Dodge Ram.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Dodge Ram | 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
Make | Dodge | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Ram | CLK |
Year Released | 1998 | 2004 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3906 cc | 5441 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 173 HP | 362 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 510 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2070 kg | 1812 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2030 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2860 mm |