1998 Dodge Ram vs. 2011 Opel Combo
To start off, 2011 Opel Combo is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 3,905 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Dodge Ram (173 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 2011 Opel Combo. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2011 Opel Combo.
Because 1998 Dodge Ram is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Dodge Ram. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Opel Combo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Dodge Ram (305 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Opel Combo. (126 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1998 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Opel Combo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Dodge Ram | 2011 Opel Combo | |
| Make | Dodge | Opel |
| Model | Ram | Combo |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3905 cc | 1364 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 173 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 126 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4330 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2030 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2720 mm |
