1998 Eagle Talon vs. 1982 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 1998 Eagle Talon is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1982 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Eagle Talon weights approximately 520 kg more than 1982 Jaguar XJR.
Because 1982 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Eagle Talon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Eagle Talon | 1982 Jaguar XJR | |
| Make | Eagle | Jaguar |
| Model | Talon | XJR |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 5343 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1050 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2870 mm |
