1998 Eagle Vision vs. 2006 Mazda 3

To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Eagle Vision. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Eagle Vision would be higher. At 2,700 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Eagle Vision (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 3. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Eagle Vision should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Eagle Vision weights approximately 335 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1998 Eagle Vision has automatic transmission and 2006 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2006 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Eagle Vision will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1998 Eagle Vision 2006 Mazda 3
Make Eagle Mazda
Model Vision 3
Year Released 1998 2006
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2700 cc 1999 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 197 HP 148 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1570 kg 1235 kg
Vehicle Length 5320 mm 4500 mm
Vehicle Width 1910 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1470 mm