1998 Eagle Vision vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Eagle Vision. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Eagle Vision would be higher. At 2,700 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Eagle Vision (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 2008 Rover 75. (129 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Eagle Vision should accelerate faster than 2008 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Rover 75 weights approximately 15 kg more than 1998 Eagle Vision.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Eagle Vision | 2008 Rover 75 | |
Make | Eagle | Rover |
Model | Vision | 75 |
Year Released | 1998 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2700 cc | 1951 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1585 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |