1998 Fiat Bravo vs. 1941 Packard 12
To start off, 1998 Fiat Bravo is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Packard 12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Packard 12 would be higher. At 7,301 cc (12 cylinders), 1941 Packard 12 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Packard 12 weights approximately 1260 kg more than 1998 Fiat Bravo.
Because 1941 Packard 12 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1941 Packard 12. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Fiat Bravo | 1941 Packard 12 | |
Make | Fiat | Packard |
Model | Bravo | 12 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1941 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1908 cc | 7301 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 152 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 2450 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 5800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 3440 mm |