1998 Fiat Bravo vs. 1963 Pontiac Tempest
To start off, 1998 Fiat Bravo is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 5,341 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Pontiac Tempest (212 HP) has 60 more horse power than 1998 Fiat Bravo. (152 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Pontiac Tempest should accelerate faster than 1998 Fiat Bravo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Pontiac Tempest weights approximately 160 kg more than 1998 Fiat Bravo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Pontiac Tempest is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Pontiac Tempest. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Fiat Bravo | 1963 Pontiac Tempest | |
Make | Fiat | Pontiac |
Model | Bravo | Tempest |
Year Released | 1998 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1908 cc | 5341 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 152 HP | 212 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2930 mm |