1998 Fiat Bravo vs. 1973 Lancia 2000
To start off, 1998 Fiat Bravo is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Lancia 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Lancia 2000 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Lancia 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Fiat Bravo (152 HP) has 38 more horse power than 1973 Lancia 2000. (114 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 1973 Lancia 2000.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Fiat Bravo (186 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Lancia 2000. (170 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1998 Fiat Bravo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Lancia 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Fiat Bravo | 1973 Lancia 2000 | |
Make | Fiat | Lancia |
Model | Bravo | 2000 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1973 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1908 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 152 HP | 114 HP |
Torque | 186 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.7 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.7:1 | 8.9:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1190 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2490 mm |