1998 Fiat Bravo vs. 1975 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1998 Fiat Bravo is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,565 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Fiat Bravo (152 HP) has 36 more horse power than 1975 Nissan Cedric. (116 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 1975 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 260 kg more than 1998 Fiat Bravo.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Fiat Bravo (186 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Nissan Cedric. (179 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1998 Fiat Bravo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Fiat Bravo | 1975 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Fiat | Nissan |
Model | Bravo | Cedric |
Year Released | 1998 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1908 cc | 2565 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 152 HP | 116 HP |
Torque | 186 Nm | 179 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1450 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2700 mm |