1998 Fiat Bravo vs. 1992 Porsche 968
To start off, 1998 Fiat Bravo is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Porsche 968. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Porsche 968 would be higher. At 2,990 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Porsche 968 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Porsche 968 (241 HP) has 89 more horse power than 1998 Fiat Bravo. (152 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Porsche 968 should accelerate faster than 1998 Fiat Bravo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Porsche 968 weights approximately 210 kg more than 1998 Fiat Bravo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1992 Porsche 968 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Porsche 968. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Porsche 968 (305 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Fiat Bravo. (186 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1992 Porsche 968 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Fiat Bravo.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Fiat Bravo | 1992 Porsche 968 | |
Make | Fiat | Porsche |
Model | Bravo | 968 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1992 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1908 cc | 2990 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 152 HP | 241 HP |
Torque | 186 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 104 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.7 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.7:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.4 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 92 L |