1998 Fiat Bravo vs. 1996 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1998 Fiat Bravo is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 1,908 cc (5 cylinders), 1998 Fiat Bravo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Fiat Bravo (152 HP) has 38 more horse power than 1996 Toyota Celica. (114 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 1996 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 95 kg more than 1996 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Fiat Bravo (186 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Toyota Celica. (154 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1998 Fiat Bravo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Fiat Bravo | 1996 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Fiat | Toyota |
Model | Bravo | Celica |
Year Released | 1998 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1908 cc | 1762 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 152 HP | 114 HP |
Torque | 186 Nm | 154 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.7 mm | 78 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1760 mm |