1998 Fiat Bravo vs. 2004 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2004 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Fiat Bravo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Fiat Bravo would be higher. At 3,933 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Thunderbird (280 HP) has 128 more horse power than 1998 Fiat Bravo. (152 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1998 Fiat Bravo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 522 kg more than 1998 Fiat Bravo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Thunderbird (388 Nm) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Fiat Bravo. (186 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Fiat Bravo.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Fiat Bravo | 2004 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Bravo | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 1998 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1908 cc | 3933 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 152 HP | 280 HP |
Torque | 186 Nm | 388 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.7 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.7:1 | 10.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1712 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.2 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.4 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 68 L |